Set in late 80's early 90's brooklyn, "Do the Right Thing," gives an inside look at the boiling racial tensions on a blisteringly hot day in the borough. The reason why i truly loved this movie, is because it valued the thoughts of the viewer, constantly asking the audience quesitons. "Who was in the wrong in the end?" "Why can't we just get along?" "Is violence the answer to any problem?" Spike Lee is a great director in his ability to present a risque issue in an almost completely objective fashion. One could interepret his position in a million ways- he supports mookie in the end, he supports Sal, he supports violence, he hates violence.

From a cinematic angle, this movie was really a great success. Lee's use of canted angles, close-ups, and low and high angles fully show the passions that these people are experiencing living in these extreme conditions. What really enticed me was the scene where various characters are alone on the screen yelling racial slurs and the camera is zooming in on them. What surprised me about this point in the movie is that all of the rants were asides. These werent said directly to people, they were said to the camera - purposefully breaking the fourth wall. What made this an exelent cinematic choice is the bluntness: rather than have the viewer interepret characters' facial expressions, and subtelties, Spike Lee puts it right on the table how certain people feel about others.

Dramatically i was captured by Sal's character. A sad man who has undying faith in the people who he cooks for, ends up being the victim of a riot. It is like biting the hand that feeds you.....literally. The actor - Dan Aiello, who recieved an Oscar nomination for this role - really captured the sad rejection that Sal is experiencing. His performance moved me.

Another aspect that i thought was vital to this movie was Spike Lee's choices in music. Sticking with the theme of showing the vibrant culture of Brooklyn, Lee puts jazz, gospel, and soul music into this movie. What is interesting is that sometimes he puts it at moments where it makes the least sense. For instance: a sad gospel during a happy scene, an upbeat jazz piece during a time of morbidity. It was an interesting contrast that i dont completely understand, but i appreciate.